Alright, America, I'll do it. As Republican Primary turmoil inches toward back-room panic, a brokered nominating convention seems increasingly possible. Therefore, I stand ready to step in and save the Republican Party from itself. With this awful roster of candidates, we can just fast forward to Cleveland in the Summer. (Incidentally, have you ever heard a more romantic phrase?) We can have a few rounds of meaningless delegate votes for funsies before we get down to business. And that business is the business of moving America Ever Forward! Nominate me and I will heal this party and sweep to victory in November.
That is some fancy talk, but what are your qualifications?
Here are but a few:
*I have been a Tea Partier for years. (My daughter throws delightful shindigs for me and her imaginary friends.)
*The only time I flip-flop is when on the beach.
*I have never had , and solemnly swear to never have, an abortion.
*I have lots of experience negotiating with the Chinese (food delivery guy).
*I have a firm grasp of the way government works after years of studying George Lucas' documentaries on the Imperial Senate and watching The West Wing in its entirety. (Twice!)
*I have more energy than Jeb, I am less smarmy than Ted "the next George Washington" Cruz, and I will never be accused of wearing a hair helmet. (In fact, look at my photo. When was the last time you saw a candidate with a bad beard and rumpled red pants? I am the change you need America.)
Okay, so you seem at least as qualified as the current front-runner. But what do you bring to the table?
I'm glad you asked.
*At least four years of dad jokes. (Ex.- Winning in November will be no picnic, but I will not act like a hot dog beacuse I relish the opportunity to ketchup in the polls so I may serve our great nation.)
*Guns for everyone! Especially the most demented and mentally challenged among us. I support the right to bear arms. And bare arms. Sun's out, guns out, amiright?
*Less of that hard, thinkin' stuff like healthcare reform and how to save Social Security and more meat and potatoes issues like making the day after the Super Bowl a national holiday.
*An executive order that states only Republican presidents may issue executive orders.
Well, your platform is no more shallow than the current front-runner's. Do you have any hats that say anything about making America Great Again? Wait a minute...aren't you registered as an Independent?
Yes, but I see this as an opportunity. An opportunity to bring me fame and fortune and everything that goes with it. (I thank you all.) I see this as an opportunity to right the ship, to take back a party that for too long has spit in the face of moderates with its war mongering, world policing, free spending, Palin nominating , gay bashing, wall building disrespect for the center. I see our opportunity to beat the other guys. Feel the Bern? It sounds like we'll all have gonorrhea by 2017. Mrs. Clinton? A lady President? Ewwww. But we are not going to beat the left with the hobgoblin lineup you guys are trotting out there now.
So, do what's right. No more Trumper Tantrums, no more singing the Cruz blues, no more sleepy brain surgeons. I'm here to help, so Follow the Nose. There's a Hail-storm moving in, make sure you're on the right side of the umbrella, America.
Hailey '16
Ever Forward!
Wednesday, January 27, 2016
Wednesday, January 20, 2016
Of Bullies and Bomb Threats.
Being a kid today seems like a good gig. Vaccines ward off disease, technology advances at light speed, yogurt comes in a tube that requires no spoon. But some childhood challenges cut through all generations. One of those is bullying. Our family is dealing with my daughter's first experience with the subject. As a parent, it is a little daunting, as this seems like such an opportunity to get things right, to have those teachable moments, to lay a foundation for Grace to learn how to handle these situations. Grace, a first grader, is getting picked on by another passenger on the school bus. It seems like a minor deal, some name calling and a little hair pulling, but it bothers her enough that she brought to our attention. Minor, though it may be, it is something I want to nip in the bud because she does not have to tolerate it. I don't need a PSA or an after-school special to tell me bullying is real. I was picked on as a kid (not anything too terrible) and probably passively endorsed other kids getting bullied by laughing along, or worse yet, not saying anything at all.
My first instinct, of course, is to protect Grace. Protect her from harm, protect her from bad feelings, protect her from the anxiety that can come from worrying about harm and bad feelings. This is tricky to navigate. For one, I want her to be tough enough to withstand some name calling. Secondly, she is being raised by two sarcastic parents who are products of a sarcastic, insult comedy generation. We joke with Grace, often trading barbs with her that are really quite funny. I have worked at jobs where we said terrible things to each other. The employees NOT getting picked on were the outsiders. I guess what I am saying is that I need to make sure I have my bullying recognition calibrated correctly. I don't want to overreact, nor do I want to downplay a real problem. I want Grace to be able handle herself, but I must make sure I do not minimize what she tells us. I also know the best way I can help her is teach her the tools she can use to try to resolve the situation herself. If we want to raise a resourceful, resilient kid, we can't fight her battles.
So what are the tools with which we should equip Grace? I want to tell Grace the next time the girl pulls her hair she should pop the bully in the mouth or least give her a good facewash (I watch a lot of hockey.) That, however, seems a little counterproductive. After all, we are looking to defuse, not incite the situation. In fact, I am proud of Grace for not retaliating. We told Grace to ask the bully to stop and warn her that if she didn't then Grace would tell the bus driver. Grace, as shy as she is in certain instances, doesn't want to rock the boat. She also doesn't want to be a tattle-tale. How do we instill, in our quickly -growing girl, the confidence to stand up for herself? Obviously, if she makes no headway with the bully or the bus driver, I will step in. Because the only anxiety a student should feel about going to school is whether or not she studied enough for her spelling quiz.
Which is why these cowards calling in bomb threats to schools piss me off so badly. Kids should be able to walk into school free from "real world" worries like active shooters, bombs, and terror threats. In effect, the callers, whether they be pranksters or terrorists, are bullying an entire community of children. At the very least, these calls are disruptive. At worst, as highly unlikely as it seems, they are the first act of a terror plot. Who really knows the scoop with these calls that have happened up and down the East Coast? If the FBI does, they are not saying. I know investigations take time. I have faith in the investigation. What I have less faith in is the response of the school board and local officials.
I believe local law enforcement has student safety as their top priority. If it pleases the court, I will stipulate that, indeed, I have no law enforcement training. I will concede that, as Sheriff Lewis pointed out in his press release, law enforcement possesses preliminary information that I do not. But for my money the only information necessary to decide to evacuate a school is that there has been a threat. Do I really think these robocalls are ISIS probing for information about response times and tactics? No. But you never know. I understand that it is incredibly disruptive, but why not evacuate a school every time one of these calls come in? It only takes being wrong once for an awful tragedy to occur. Fortunately, the school system has wised up (It only took a bunch of parental complaints, right guys?) and is now informing parents as these problems occur, not well after. So far, Grace's school has been unaffected. I suppose if her school is threatened I will have to make the choice of whether I go get her or not. As far as I know, she knows nothing of the threats at other schools. She has no anxiety in regards to these threats. Other students are not so lucky. It is a damn shame that, whether because of bullies or worse, our children can not go to school feeling safe, secure and ready to learn.
My first instinct, of course, is to protect Grace. Protect her from harm, protect her from bad feelings, protect her from the anxiety that can come from worrying about harm and bad feelings. This is tricky to navigate. For one, I want her to be tough enough to withstand some name calling. Secondly, she is being raised by two sarcastic parents who are products of a sarcastic, insult comedy generation. We joke with Grace, often trading barbs with her that are really quite funny. I have worked at jobs where we said terrible things to each other. The employees NOT getting picked on were the outsiders. I guess what I am saying is that I need to make sure I have my bullying recognition calibrated correctly. I don't want to overreact, nor do I want to downplay a real problem. I want Grace to be able handle herself, but I must make sure I do not minimize what she tells us. I also know the best way I can help her is teach her the tools she can use to try to resolve the situation herself. If we want to raise a resourceful, resilient kid, we can't fight her battles.
So what are the tools with which we should equip Grace? I want to tell Grace the next time the girl pulls her hair she should pop the bully in the mouth or least give her a good facewash (I watch a lot of hockey.) That, however, seems a little counterproductive. After all, we are looking to defuse, not incite the situation. In fact, I am proud of Grace for not retaliating. We told Grace to ask the bully to stop and warn her that if she didn't then Grace would tell the bus driver. Grace, as shy as she is in certain instances, doesn't want to rock the boat. She also doesn't want to be a tattle-tale. How do we instill, in our quickly -growing girl, the confidence to stand up for herself? Obviously, if she makes no headway with the bully or the bus driver, I will step in. Because the only anxiety a student should feel about going to school is whether or not she studied enough for her spelling quiz.
Which is why these cowards calling in bomb threats to schools piss me off so badly. Kids should be able to walk into school free from "real world" worries like active shooters, bombs, and terror threats. In effect, the callers, whether they be pranksters or terrorists, are bullying an entire community of children. At the very least, these calls are disruptive. At worst, as highly unlikely as it seems, they are the first act of a terror plot. Who really knows the scoop with these calls that have happened up and down the East Coast? If the FBI does, they are not saying. I know investigations take time. I have faith in the investigation. What I have less faith in is the response of the school board and local officials.
I believe local law enforcement has student safety as their top priority. If it pleases the court, I will stipulate that, indeed, I have no law enforcement training. I will concede that, as Sheriff Lewis pointed out in his press release, law enforcement possesses preliminary information that I do not. But for my money the only information necessary to decide to evacuate a school is that there has been a threat. Do I really think these robocalls are ISIS probing for information about response times and tactics? No. But you never know. I understand that it is incredibly disruptive, but why not evacuate a school every time one of these calls come in? It only takes being wrong once for an awful tragedy to occur. Fortunately, the school system has wised up (It only took a bunch of parental complaints, right guys?) and is now informing parents as these problems occur, not well after. So far, Grace's school has been unaffected. I suppose if her school is threatened I will have to make the choice of whether I go get her or not. As far as I know, she knows nothing of the threats at other schools. She has no anxiety in regards to these threats. Other students are not so lucky. It is a damn shame that, whether because of bullies or worse, our children can not go to school feeling safe, secure and ready to learn.
Tuesday, January 19, 2016
Ziggy and Me
Last week, I solicited Facebook friends for writing ideas. I was subsequently challenged, based on the fact that I don't seriously listen to music or know much about it, to write a music review. Another friend liked the idea and suggested I start with David Bowie's music since, upon learning of Bowie's death, I had mentioned I was not saddened or as touched as so many others. So, this is where I begin. Being too cheap to actually pay for music, even for this experiment, I listened to most of Slacker's David Bowie Top 33. I'm sure by not listening chronologically or by cohesive album I am missing out thematically. Oh well, this is the best I've got. Baby steps, people.
Perhaps this is where I should set some expectations. I know little musical jargon; I don't know how to talk about music beyond the way it makes me feel. This entire exercise is akin to sending a person who eats nothing but Spaghettios and franks in to critique a five star French restaurant. He may be able to say, "oooh, that tastes good," but he'll lack the ability to make distinctions in the palate, he may not be able to describe the subtleties and textures. I also have always had trouble deciphering lyrics. I don't mean analyzing their subtext, I mean literally picking out the words sometimes. (Example: At least into my twenties, I thought Neil Diamond was singing about some overly casual preacher, Reverend Blue Jeans.) My wife makes fun, but sometimes the volume of the music or the singers voice (I'm looking at you Eddy Vedder.) make it impossible for me to hear the words clearly. So with this info as the backdrop, I put on my headphones, grab my Spaghettios-eatin' spoon and press play.
My Rather Short, Totally Uninformed Review:
I get it now. I get why people felt a genuine sense of loss when hearing of Bowie's passing. It is more universal than I realized, I guess. There were several recognizable songs where I said, "Huh, so that's Davis Bowie, eh?" There is a little something for everyone in his music. Some of it is fun. Fun in a way that makes we want to dance like I would never let ANYBODY see me dance. (Me doling out moves like Jagger would be a true assault on the eyes.)
Some of the music practically pulsates with urgency. There is a yearning driving so much of it. A yearning to escape, a yearning to be understood, an urgent yearning to stand up and shout, "Look at me. This is who I am. Tough shit if you don't like it!" I have long said weird is the new normal. Weird should be celebrated. I suppose we have ground-breaking artists like David Bowie to thank for that. He made it okay, through costume, through lyrics, and through deed, to be different. He brought outsiders in. I understand how relatable he must be to so many who struggled with identity, who struggled to gain acceptance.
Beyond what his performances represent, of course, there are the performances themselves. The music seems complex, at least to my simple reptilian brain. The change of pace, the "arrangements"(?) keep you on your toes. And that voice. The voice of a chameleon, ever adjusting to mood and theme. A voice sometimes beckoning, sometimes powerful, sometimes playful, but never timid. A voice stretching through the stars to entrance and entertain. I get it now. Bowie still would not be my first choice when reaching for a cd, but I understand why he might be yours.
So, how'd I do? I don't suppose I'll be hired by Rolling Stone anytime soon. Send all hate mail to the That's No Moon World Headquarters. Maybe, if you are lucky, I'll make music reviews a regular thing.
Perhaps this is where I should set some expectations. I know little musical jargon; I don't know how to talk about music beyond the way it makes me feel. This entire exercise is akin to sending a person who eats nothing but Spaghettios and franks in to critique a five star French restaurant. He may be able to say, "oooh, that tastes good," but he'll lack the ability to make distinctions in the palate, he may not be able to describe the subtleties and textures. I also have always had trouble deciphering lyrics. I don't mean analyzing their subtext, I mean literally picking out the words sometimes. (Example: At least into my twenties, I thought Neil Diamond was singing about some overly casual preacher, Reverend Blue Jeans.) My wife makes fun, but sometimes the volume of the music or the singers voice (I'm looking at you Eddy Vedder.) make it impossible for me to hear the words clearly. So with this info as the backdrop, I put on my headphones, grab my Spaghettios-eatin' spoon and press play.
My Rather Short, Totally Uninformed Review:
I get it now. I get why people felt a genuine sense of loss when hearing of Bowie's passing. It is more universal than I realized, I guess. There were several recognizable songs where I said, "Huh, so that's Davis Bowie, eh?" There is a little something for everyone in his music. Some of it is fun. Fun in a way that makes we want to dance like I would never let ANYBODY see me dance. (Me doling out moves like Jagger would be a true assault on the eyes.)
Some of the music practically pulsates with urgency. There is a yearning driving so much of it. A yearning to escape, a yearning to be understood, an urgent yearning to stand up and shout, "Look at me. This is who I am. Tough shit if you don't like it!" I have long said weird is the new normal. Weird should be celebrated. I suppose we have ground-breaking artists like David Bowie to thank for that. He made it okay, through costume, through lyrics, and through deed, to be different. He brought outsiders in. I understand how relatable he must be to so many who struggled with identity, who struggled to gain acceptance.
Beyond what his performances represent, of course, there are the performances themselves. The music seems complex, at least to my simple reptilian brain. The change of pace, the "arrangements"(?) keep you on your toes. And that voice. The voice of a chameleon, ever adjusting to mood and theme. A voice sometimes beckoning, sometimes powerful, sometimes playful, but never timid. A voice stretching through the stars to entrance and entertain. I get it now. Bowie still would not be my first choice when reaching for a cd, but I understand why he might be yours.
So, how'd I do? I don't suppose I'll be hired by Rolling Stone anytime soon. Send all hate mail to the That's No Moon World Headquarters. Maybe, if you are lucky, I'll make music reviews a regular thing.